Days 1-2
Map
Choose one review queue, safe sample set, baseline, acceptance criteria and expensive failure modes.
10-day fixed-scope evaluation
Test one medical-document workflow before you fund a platform.
KamiBridge builds and measures one evidence-linked review queue using synthetic or appropriately de-identified samples. Your qualified reviewer keeps every final decision.
Days 3-6
Build
Configure one principal input, evidence-linked findings, exception states and one agreed output.
Days 7-9
Evaluate
Run side by side and measure coverage, disagreements, reviewer time and failure cases.
Day 10
Decide
Review the evidence and receive a written go, revise or stop recommendation.
Decision-ready output
Judge the workflow by evidence, failures and reviewer impact.
Field-level findings with source locations
Coverage, exceptions and material disagreement examples
Reviewer handling-time comparison
Security, retention and deployment considerations
Written production recommendation, including reasons not to proceed
Good fit
A repeated document or coding review queue has an accountable owner.
Your team can define a safe sample and measurable current process.
A qualified reviewer will approve or correct every material result.
Not a fit
You require autonomous coding or claim submission without review.
You need a production guarantee before a controlled evaluation.
There is no measurable baseline or accountable workflow owner.
Pilot request
Bring one queue, not a transformation program.
Describe the current review step and desired output. We will reply within two business days with the next useful question.